To me art is the freedom of expression no matter who you are. If you are a railwayman or a preacher like Van Gogh was or you do any other job. It would be wrong to call art a branch of science 'cause it deals with emotions. It is certainly not a science. You cannot examine it. All you can do is to judge whether you like it or not.
I know some people who don't recall the names of their favourite painters but only remember their masterpieces and the feelings that accompanied them. I paint and I draw mainly because I realise my feelings on the canvas. I can observe the touch of the paint brush and enjoy the outcome. What is more and I want to emphasize it here is that everyone can have his input in art. It doesn't matter if you are skillful at painting or you paint childishly. You enrich art with your own input and the richness of your expression, the richness of your personality.
I heard at my painting course that Picasso actually destroyed art with his kitch. I don't know what is your opinion on this but I think that he enriched art with his cubism and mayhem. His art was actually who he was. He had the right to express himself and have his audience of admirers. Personally , I admire his art but it is something personal and you can have a different opinion. So all in all , what I want to empasize and it is my opinion only that the beauty of art lies in everyone's expression. Nobody impoverishes art as such. Everyone has got his only input which is extraordinary.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz